Unfortunately, the concept of one player, one vote is something few people want to give up. The Vototron and Group Votes were abolished for the same reason; Supposedly they are 'undemocratic'. Does the Vototron favor rich players? Maybe, but how did those players become point-rich? By passing proposals that people liked, taking offices and receiving legitimate salaries. They did NOT get randomly chosen to be rich and powerful!
I have no idea how Group Votes are considered undemocratic. Many world governments are considered democratic, and yet the legislative, executive and judicial power is placed in the hands of a small minority of people. In my opinion, there is nothing inherently wrong about someone giving up power to someone else voluntarily. And if you complain that the groups-have-all-the-power-and-points-and-they-can-pass-any-proposal-they-want, form your own group! It is perfectly democratic because anyone can do it!
Votes' dynamicity was reduced before I even came to Agora, and I am deeply disappointed that the fundamental aspect of the game has become so static. The fundamental point of any game is to have fun - and how can anyone have fun if we are all too worried about being safe?