From owner-nomic-official@teleport.com Wed Mar 6 09:41:58 1996 Received: from desiree.teleport.com (desiree.teleport.com [192.108.254.21]) by Shamino.quincy.edu (8.6.12/8.6.9) with ESMTP id JAA27402 for ; Wed, 6 Mar 1996 09:41:57 -0600 Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) by desiree.teleport.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id HAA28470; Wed, 6 Mar 1996 07:33:14 -0800 Received: by desiree.teleport.com (bulk_mailer v1.3); Wed, 6 Mar 1996 07:33:12 -0800 Received: (from daemon@localhost) by desiree.teleport.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) id HAA28432 for nomic-official-outgoing; Wed, 6 Mar 1996 07:33:11 -0800 Received: from torii.triple-i.com (torii.triple-i.com [192.94.150.1]) by desiree.teleport.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with ESMTP id HAA28412 for ; Wed, 6 Mar 1996 07:33:05 -0800 Received: from siesta (siesta+.triple-i.com [192.94.150.7]) by torii.triple-i.com (8.6.9/8.6.9) with SMTP id HAA21138 for ; Wed, 6 Mar 1996 07:32:32 -0800 Received: from pak by siesta (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA21088; Wed, 6 Mar 96 07:32:31 PST Date: Wed, 6 Mar 96 07:32:31 PST From: jlc@triple-i.com (Jeff Caruso) Message-Id: <9603061532.AA21088@siesta> Received: by pak (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA00328; Wed, 6 Mar 96 07:32:31 PST To: nomic-official@teleport.com Subject: OFF: Assignment of Appeal of CFJ 860: favor, elJefe, and Steve Cc: jlc@triple-i.com Sender: owner-nomic-official@teleport.com Reply-To: nomic-discussion@teleport.com Precedence: bulk Status: RO ====================================================================== ASSIGNMENT OF APPEAL: INJUNCTION IN CFJ 860 ""Where the Rules call for a Player to be nominated to perform, or not perform, any action or duty, it is sufficient to nominate an Officer to perform that action, the current holder of that Office and eir successor(s) then being responsible for the action or duty" ====================================================================== Board of Appeals: Decision: favor [ ] elJefe [ ] Steve [ ] Under consideration: whether the Injunction, that Rule 1590 be annotated to the effect of the Statement, had been made in accorance with the Rules. Decision on the Injunction: [ ] Judge: Doug Judgement: TRUE Caller: Greycell Barred: On Hold: Blob Eligible: Andre, Chuck, Coren, dcuman, Doug, elJefe, favor, Gecko, Ghost, Jtael, Kelly, KoJen, Michael, Morendil, Murphy, Steve, Swann, Vanyel, Zefram Requested Injunction: that Rule 1590 be annotated to this effect. Note: The Judgement of this CFJ is not under appeal, and is official judgement for the time being. The Justices are to consider only the question of whether the Injunction was legal. ====================================================================== History: Called by Greycell, Tue, 5 Mar 1996 08:05:28 +-1000 Assigned to Doug, Mon, 4 Mar 96 19:16:37 PST Judged TRUE by Doug, Tue, 05 Mar 1996 18:19:22 -0500 Injunction appealed by Kelly, Tue, 5 Mar 96 18:33:34 EST5 Injunction appealed by Chuck, Wed, 6 Mar 1996 01:03:37 -0600 (CST) Assigned to favor as Justice, as of this message Assigned to elJefe as Justice, as of this message Assigned to Steve as Justice, as of this message ====================================================================== Argument -------- Rule 1590/0 (Maintainer of SLC's) requires a Player to be specified to maintain a record of the content of a SLC. Common sense dictates that this assignment should be synonymous with assigniong the task to a specified Officer. Since there are procedures within the Rules for ensuring that (as near as dammit) any Officer is always a Player, this Judgement should hold. ====================================================================== Decision of Judge Doug: TRUE I Judge that the statement is TRUE and grant the request for Injunction. H. Rulekeepor, please make the requested annotation. Since an Officer is always a particular Player (by 1006(5)), specifying an Officer satisfies 1590's requirement to specify a Player. I would like to caution the Players that specifying an Officer is sufficient, but _not_ necessary, to specify a Player. (The two concepts are _not_ synonymous.) I attach Rule 1590(0) and 1006(5) below as Evidence: ___________ Rule 1590/0 (Mutable, MI=1) Maintainer of SLCs For a SLC to be legally authorized, the Rules must specify a Player who is required to maintain a record of the content of that SLC; this Player is known as the Maintainer of that SLC. The Maintainer of a given SLC must provide a copy of it to any other Player who requests it, as soon as possible after the request is made. E must also provide an updated copy of the SLC to all Players within its Jurisdiction as soon as possible after the SLC changes for any reason.. History: Created by Proposal 2490, Feb. 16 1996 ___________ Rule 1006/5 (Mutable, MI=1) Defaults for Officers An Office is a position of authority or responsibility established by the Rules and held by a Player, who is called an Officer. At any time, for each Office there shall be exactly one Officer who holds it. A position of responsibility or authority is only an Office if the Rules specifically designate it as such. An Office only exists as long as there is a Rule in force which specifies that it exists. If the Rule or Rules which mandated the existence of an Office are changed such that they no longer do so, that Office ceases to exist. A given Office has whatever duties, responsibilities, and privileges that the Rules assign to it. History: Created by Proposal 386, Aug. 16 1993 Amended by Proposal 733, Nov. 24 1993 Amended by Proposal 881, date unknown Amended by Rule 750, date unknown Amended by Proposal 1006, ca. Aug. 25 1994 Amended by Rule 750, ca. Aug. 25 1994 Amended(1) by Proposal 1336, Nov. 22 1994 Amended(2) by Proposal 1582, May 15 1995 Amended(3) by Proposal 1699, Sep. 1 1995 Amended(4) by Proposal 1763, Oct. 31 1995 Amended(5) by Proposal 2442, Feb. 6 1996 _____________________ Oops, I forgot.... you may all sit down now. :) This Court is adjourned..... __________________________________________ Doug Chatham Email: dchatham@utk.edu Web page #1: http://funnelweb.utcc.utk.edu/~chatham/ Web page #2: http://www.math.utk.edu/~rchatham/