CFJ 39 has been submitted by Wes. The Judge shall be: David Wagner > From: wesc@ichips.intel.com > Message-Id: <9309230144.AA31537@pdx082.intel.com> > Subject: CLERK: New CFJ's > To: alexx@world.std.com, wesc@ichips.intel.com > Date: Wed, 22 Sep 1993 18:44:38 -0700 (PDT) > --- > Rule 106 states that "All Rule Changes proposed in the proper way shall be > Voted upon." Because Rule 385 atttempts to prevent proposed Rule Changed, > or Proposals, from being Voted upon, even if they are properly proposed, > (as per Rule 415), Rule 385 is illegal and is entirely void, as per Rule 111. > --- > Other Rules referenced: > > 106. Adoption of a Rule Change: > All Rule Changes proposed in the proper way shall be Voted on. > They will be Adopted if and only if they receive the required number > of Votes and Quorum is achieved. > > 111. Conflicts between Immutables and Mutables: > In a conflict between a Mutable and an Immutable Rule, the > immutable Rule takes precedence and the Mutable Rule shall be > entirely void. For the purposes of this Rule a Proposal to > Transmute an Immutable Rule does not "conflict" with that Immutable > Rule. > > 415. Submissions of Proposals: > A Proposal by a Voter shall be made by submitting it to the Mighty > Speaker. As soon as possible after receiving the Proposal, the Mighty > Speaker shall assign the Proposal a Number and distribute the Proposal > along with its number to all Players. > > The Mighty Speaker may also make Proposals. The Mighty Speaker must > process all pending Voter-submitted Proposals first, and may then > Process Proposals of the Mighty Speaker, assigning these Proposals a > number and distributing them in the same fashion as any other Proposal. [Comments from Clerk: These are tricky. I am not sure what should be done here, but I do urge Judges to take note of Rule 404 as well, as it seems to be relevant.] { David Wagner defaulted on 1/10/93, and was replaced by Kirt Dankmyer on the same day. } { 2/10/93: Kirt accepts }