Call for Judgement 36 Ronald Kunne has submitted Call For Judgement number 36. The Judge will be: Kirt A Dankmyer As always, the Judge has three days from this posting to accept or decline his appointment, and seven days to deliver Judgement. > Message-Id: <199309201117.AA21620@world.std.com> > Date: Mon, 20 Sep 93 13:15:58 MET > From: KUNNE@frcpn11.in2p3.fr > Subject: Accusing the Speaker > To: alexx@world.std.com > Call for Judgment > "The Speaker, > by retracting proposal 467 while knowing that there would be > at least six votes against, > influenced the result of the vote on that proposal. > Therefore he violated Rule 452 and committed a Class C Crime." > > As justification I add the beginning of The Speaker's message as > well as Rule 452 > >Date: Thu, 16 Sep 93 09:38:09 -0400 > >From: cogen@ll.mit.edu (David Cogen) > >Subject: 467 is withdrawn > >X-Sequence: 1427 > >Proposal 467 "Penalty For Unnecessary Judgements" is withdrawn. > >David Cogen loses 3 points. > >David Cogen 14-3=11 > > > >Being the Speaker puts me in the interesting position of being able to > >ascertain before the end of the voting period that the outcome was not going to > >be favorable. So far, with 6 votes in, there was not a single FOR vote! > > Rule 452: > > Prohibition of Electioneering by the Mighty Speaker: > > The Speaker may not use eis knowledge of the current status of a vote > > on a Proposal in an attempt to influence the result of the Vote on that > > Proposal. Violations of this Rule shall be considered a Class C Crime. Ronald Kunne has submitted Call For Judgement number 36. The Judge will be: Kirt A Dankmyer > I rule TRUE on this. { This was appealed by David Cogen on 28/9/93. As CotC Michael appointed Larry Smithmier, Wes, and David Nicol as Appeal Justices on the same day. } { 28/9/93: Wes SUSTAINS Judgement } { 29/9/93: Larry accepts appointment and SUSTAINS Judgement } { 29/9/93: David accepts and SUSTAINS Judgement }