JUDGEMENT 22 (Alexx) Mon, 30 Aug 93 STATEMENT I hereby Call for Judgement on the statement that the actual scores should be: Jim Shea 68+10+1+4+1+4+1+8+1+1 = 99 Oerjan Johansen 58+5+1+1+4+1+1+8+1 = 80 Deb and Bob 62+1+1+1+1+8+1 = 75 Alexx 45-3+1+4+1+4+1+8+1+1 = 63 Dave Bowen 54+1+4+1+1+1-1+1 = 62 Richard M Vickery 40+10+1+1+4+1+1 = 58 Karl Anderson 40+1+2+1+2+1+4+1-1-1+1-1 = 52 Eric Scheirer 43+3 = 46 Andy Latto 26-1+1+1+1+1-1+1 = 29 Kevin Watkins 29 = 29 David Cogen 24-1+4+1 = 28 Sai 24 = 24 Wes 23 = 23 Ronald Kunne 22 = 22 Michael Norrish 15+1+1+1+1-1+1 = 19 David Nicol 1-1-1+4+1+1+8+1-1-4+8+1 = 18 Joe Lindsay 0 = 0 The Ed Blevins 0 = 0 Blob <2119737@hydra.maths.unsw.edu.au> 0 = 0 These scores reflect my trade to Eric, several violations of Rule 357, and the voting results of 388 - 392. Excerpts of violations of Rule 357 appear below: > Date: 25 Aug 1993 16:10:10 -0500 (CDT) > From: DNICOL@VAX2.CSTP.UMKC.EDU > Subject: Towards easier future play > > an e-mail to the Modified speaker, whoever he turns out to be when the ^^^^^^^ > Date: 25 Aug 1993 16:36:53 -0500 (CDT) > From: DNICOL@VAX2.CSTP.UMKC.EDU > Subject: Conversation with the Neat Speaker regarding resurrecting Heroes rule > > Regarding T.V.P.Speaker Wes's conclusion, "we do not believe ^^^^^^^ > From: Andy Latto > Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1993 14:42:29 -0700 > Subject: MORE Confusion > > There is also no rule giving the Speaker exclusive rights, or even ^^^^^^^ > From: Andy Latto > Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1993 07:32:21 -0700 > Subject: Hold announcement > > Ex-Speaker (maybe) ^^^^^^^ > Date: 26 Aug 1993 12:23:18 -0500 (CDT) > From: DNICOL@VAX2.CSTP.UMKC.EDU > Subject: have your eat and cake it two > > remain informed about --- The announcements from the speaker are essential. ^^^^^^^ > PROPOSAL 398 (Michael Norrish) Wed, 25 Aug 93, 09:47 PDT > > publication (and subsequent voting etc) by the Speaker. ^^^^^^^ > PROPOSAL 399 (Karl Anderson) Thu, 26 Aug 93 > > So long as the Rulekeepor is in office, the Speaker is not required to ^^^^^^^ > PROPOSAL 415 (David Cogen) Thu, 26 Aug 93 > > believe the Speaker (and past Revered Speakers) to be the ones who are best ^^^^^^^ > Subject: Proposal format > Date: Thu, 26 Aug 93 16:44:48 -0700 > From: Karl Anderson > > The mail message containing the Proposal must be from the Speaker, and ^^^^^^^ > Date: Fri, 27 Aug 1993 12:15:11 -0500 (CDT) > From: DNICOL@VAX2.CSTP.UMKC.EDU > Subject: proposal 422 > > 422 proposes to allow impeaching the speaker with a 2/3 vote on a proposal ^^^^^^^ > If there is an evil speaker, he could get in the way of the proposal ^^^^^^^ > The method of choosing the next speaker is left up in the air. ^^^^^^^ > identity of the usurping speaker is included in the proposal, and also to ^^^^^^^ > Subject: Re: Proposals 421-422 > Date: Fri, 27 Aug 93 12:54:08 -0500 > From: dmb@fig.cray.com > > status of Rule 202. Granted a Speaker could also choose to ignore the results ^^^^^^^ > Subject: recently posted Ruleset > Date: Sat, 28 Aug 93 02:35:45 -0700 > From: Karl Anderson > > The Speaker must be able and willing to distribute a true Ruleset upon ^^^^^^^ JUDGE The Ed Blevins { This appears never to have been judged. }