JUDGEMENT 14 (David Cogen) Mon, 23 Aug 93, 09:55 Pacific Time STATEMENT: Sai is in violation of rule 364. He has not responded to the call to judge-ship within the 3 days, as stipulated. The nomination of Sai as judge was made on Aug 17, 1993 at 14:09:44 PST as shown the message from the Glorious speaker: >> START OF REPRODUCED MESSAGE Return-Path: From: wesc@ichips.intel.com Subject: Judgement 13 To: nomic@yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au (Nomic List) Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1993 14:09:44 -0800 (PDT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL21] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 814 Reply-To: NOMIC Distribution List X-Sequence: 849 The following Call for Judgement has been officially received: JUDGEMENT 13 (David Cogen) Tue, 17 Aug 93, 14:05:23 Pacific Time STATEMENT: I was inappropriately penalized for referring to the Circumcised Speaker as the "Circumsized Speaker", as this is merely another denotation for the same word. JUDGE: The Judge for this Statement shall be Sai , according to Rule 364. As per Rules 215 and 364, Sai has three days in which to decline the appointment or one week in which to return a Judgement of TRUE, FALSE, or UNDECIDED, or he shall lose 10 points. ---------- Enjoy! The Speaker -- Wes Contreras "Wherever where you go, there you are." wesc@ichips.intel.com -- Buckaroo Bonzai -- This isn't Intel's opinion. Isn't that obvious? >> END OF REPRODUCED MESSAGE Since more than 3 days have now elapsed without Sai accepting the nomination according to rule 364, he has in fact broken rule 364. JUDGE: The Judge for this Statement shall be Dave Bowen , according to Rule 364. As per Rules 215 and 364, Dave has three days in which to accept or decline the appointment and one week (if he accepts the appointment) in which to return a Judgement of TRUE, FALSE, or UNDECIDED, or he shall lose 10 points. (Mon, 23 Aug 93, 11:12 Pacific Time) David Bowen accepts his appointment as Judge. RESULT (David Bowen) Thu, 26 Aug 93, 09:18 PDT TRUE