From - Sat Jun 10 19:39:20 2000 Return-Path: Received: from gecko.serc.rmit.edu.au ([131.170.42.16]) by hazard.mail.mindspring.net (Mindspring Mail Service) with ESMTP id sk5e2u.3e1.37kb01i for ; Sat, 10 Jun 2000 17:51:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by gecko.serc.rmit.edu.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) id VAA13546 for agora-official-list; Sat, 10 Jun 2000 21:39:12 GMT Received: from fw.serc.rmit.edu.au (fw-in.serc.rmit.edu.au [131.170.42.1]) by gecko.serc.rmit.edu.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA13538 for ; Sat, 10 Jun 2000 21:38:07 GMT Received: (from mail@localhost) by fw.serc.rmit.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.1) id HAA36160 for ; Sun, 11 Jun 2000 07:46:17 +1000 (EST) Received: from unknown(147.133.1.1) by fw.serc.rmit.edu.au via smap (V2.1) id xma036155; Sun, 11 Jun 00 07:46:15 +1000 Received: (from mpslon01@localhost) by msuacad.morehead-st.edu (8.10.1/8.10.1) id e5ALf6R27905 for agora-official@gecko.serc.rmit.edu.au; Sat, 10 Jun 2000 17:41:06 -0400 (EDT) From: Michael Slone Message-Id: <200006102141.e5ALf6R27905@msuacad.morehead-st.edu> Subject: OFF: CFJ 1228 Judged TRUE To: agora-official@gecko.serc.rmit.edu.au (agora-official) Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2000 17:41:05 EDT X-Mailer: Elm [revision: 212.4] Sender: owner-agora-official@gecko.serc.rmit.edu.au Precedence: bulk Reply-To: agora-discussion@gecko.serc.rmit.edu.au X-Mozilla-Status: 8001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 X-UIDL: sk5e2u.3e1.37kb01i ============================== CFJ 1228 ============================== The Treasuror's Salary is 0.2 times the Basic Officer's Salary. ======================================================================== Called by: Murphy Judge: t Judgement: TRUE Judge selection: Eligible: Crito, Elysion, Kelly, Peekee, Steve, Taral, Wes, harvel, lee, t Not eligible: Caller: Murphy Barred: - Had eir turn: Chuck, Murphy, Palnatoke Already served: - Defaulted: Harlequin, Sherlock By request: Blob, Michael On Hold: - Zombie: Anthony, Harlequin, Novalis, Schneidster ======================================================================== History: Called by Murphy 03 Jun 2000 13:42:44 -0700 Assigned to t: 04 Jun 2000 22:52:16 -0400 Judged TRUE by t: 11 Jun 2000 00:13:42 +0300 Judgement published: As of this message ======================================================================== Caller's Arguments: On May 31, 2000, Treasuror lee changed the Budget by "setting the monthly officer salaries as follows", but e did not explicitly mention mention the Treasuror's Salary. Prior to this change, the Treasuror's Salary was 0.2 times the BOS. (E did not mention the Speaker-Elect's Salary either, but the Speaker-Elect's Salary was zero anyway.) If lee's change did not affect the Salary of any Office not explicitly mentioned, then the statement is TRUE. If it changed such Salaries to zero, then the statement is FALSE. For what it's worth, lee clearly intended the Treasuror's Salary to remain at 0.2 times the BOS. Doing so would maintain the average Compensation and average Officer's Salary both at 1.0 times the BOS (for which e has a stated preference). Eir discussion of the change in a-d, and eir subsequent paying out of Salaries, also reflect eir belief in an unchanged Treasuror's Salary. ======================================================================== Caller's Evidence: Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 08:26:06 -0500 Subject: OFF: Budget Change, Completed To: agora-official@gecko.serc.rmit.edu.au From: lee@schawk.com (_lee _kinkade) > >> I announce my intention to change the Budget, with support, by setting > >the > >> monthly officer salaries as follows: > > > >> Accountor 1.4 > >> Assessor 1.2 > >> CotC 1.2 > >> Herald 1.2 > >> Justiciar 0.2 > >> Notary 0.6 > >> Payroll 2.2 > >> Priest 1.2 > >> Promotor 1.5 > >> Registrar 1.1 > >> Rulekeepor 1.3 > >> Scorekeepor 0.7 > > >Having received the needed support, i hereby make the above listed changes >to the budget. Date: Tue, 02 May 2000 07:41:24 -0500 Subject: OFF: Treasuror's Budget To: agora-official@gecko.serc.rmit.edu.au From: lee@schawk.com (_lee _kinkade) > Officer Salaries: > In Stems > Accountor 1.6 64 > Assessor 1.4 56 > Clerk of the Courts 1 40 > Herald 0.8 32 > Justiciar 0.2 8 > Notary 0.8 32 > Payroll Clerk 1.6 64 > Priest 1 40 > Promotor 1.4 56 > Registrar 1.4 56 > Rulekeepor 1.6 64 > Scorekeepor 1 40 > Speaker-Elect 0 0 > Treasuror 0.2 8 > Speaker's Gratuity 1 40 > Judicial Salary 0.5 20 > Minimum Income 0.5 20 > Distributor's Gratuity 1 40 > New Player Award 2 80 > > Average Compensation 1 > Average Officer's Salary 1 Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 15:12:02 -0500 Subject: DIS: Re: OFF: Budget Change To: agora-discussion@gecko.serc.rmit.edu.au From: lee@schawk.com (_lee _kinkade) > Office Current Proto Proposed > Salary Change > Account 1.6 1.3 1.4 -0.2 > Assessor 1.4 1 1.2 -0.2 > CotC 1 1.2 1.2 0.2 > Herald 0.8 1.7 1.2 0.4 > Justiciar 0.2 0.2 0.2 0 > Notary 0.8 0.4 0.6 -0.2 > Payroll 1.6 2.4 2.2 0.6 > Priest 1 1.5 1.2 0.2 > Promotor 1.4 1.6 1.5 0.1 > Registrar 1.4 0.9 1.1 -0.3 > Rulekpr. 1.6 1.2 1.3 -0.3 > Scorekpr. 1 0.4 0.7 -0.3 > Speaker 0 0 0 0 > Treasuror 0.2 0.2 0.2 0 > > I have taken into account the proposed budget by Taral, the suggestions > made by Michael, and then tweaked the results to make an average of 1. Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 18:56:59 -0500 Subject: OFF: Monthly Salaries To: agora-official@gecko.serc.rmit.edu.au From: lee@schawk.com (_lee _kinkade) > I hereby order the Bank to pay the Treasuror, lee, 8 Stems.[PC00213] ======================================================================== Judge t's Arguments: I Judge this TRUE. When lee amended the budget, e did not mention the Treasuror's salary. As the amendment explicitly defined all changed salaries, it is the court's opinion that this was only a partial amendment of the budget, which did not modify any salaries which were not mentioned, therefore the Treasuror's salary retains its old value. ======================================================================== Judge t's Evidence: ======================================================================== Clerk of the Courts harvel -- Michael Slone