From - Mon May 8 18:30:55 2000 Return-Path: Received: from gecko.serc.rmit.edu.au ([131.170.42.16]) by fb04.eng00.mindspring.net (Mindspring Mail Service) with ESMTP id sh97sp.19d.37kbi5a for ; Sat, 6 May 2000 18:41:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by gecko.serc.rmit.edu.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) id WAA26346 for agora-official-list; Sat, 6 May 2000 22:30:32 GMT Received: from fw.serc.rmit.edu.au (fw-in.serc.rmit.edu.au [131.170.42.1]) by gecko.serc.rmit.edu.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA26343 for ; Sat, 6 May 2000 22:30:30 GMT Received: (from mail@localhost) by fw.serc.rmit.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.1) id IAA25025 for ; Sun, 7 May 2000 08:51:18 +1000 (EST) Received: from msuacad.morehead-st.edu(147.133.1.1) by fw.serc.rmit.edu.au via smap (V2.1) id xma025023; Sun, 7 May 00 08:51:17 +1000 Received: (from mpslon01@localhost) by msuacad.morehead-st.edu (8.7.1/8.7.1) id SAA07225 for agora-official@gecko.serc.rmit.edu.au; Sat, 6 May 2000 18:33:30 -0400 (EDT) From: Michael Slone Message-Id: <200005062233.SAA07225@msuacad.morehead-st.edu> Subject: OFF: CFJ 1210 Judged TRUE To: agora-official@gecko.serc.rmit.edu.au (agora-official) Date: Sat, 06 May 2000 18:33:30 EDT X-Mailer: Elm [revision: 212.4] Sender: owner-agora-official@gecko.serc.rmit.edu.au Precedence: bulk Reply-To: agora-discussion@gecko.serc.rmit.edu.au X-Mozilla-Status: 8001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 X-UIDL: sh97sp.19d.37kbi5a ============================== CFJ 1210 ============================== Kelly is not the nickname of a Player[.] ======================================================================== Called by: Palnatoke Judge: Murphy Judgement: TRUE Judge selection: Eligible: Murphy, Peekee Not eligible: Caller: Palnatoke Barred: - Had eir turn: Blob, Chuck, Crito, Elysion, Kelly, Palnatoke, Sherlock, Steve, Taral, Wes, else...if, harvel, lee, t Already served: - Defaulted: Harlequin By request: Michael On Hold: Novalis Zombie: Anthony, Harlequin, Schneidster ======================================================================== History: Called by Palnatoke 01 May 2000 11:34:36 +0200 Assigned to Murphy: 01 May 2000 17:19:34 -0400 Judged TRUE by Murphy: 06 May 2000 11:37:25 -0700 Judgement published: As of this message ======================================================================== Caller's Arguments: ======================================================================== Caller's Evidence: ======================================================================== Judge Murphy's Arguments: Kelly wrote: > >Kelly, have you intended to select "Kelly" as your nickname, at any time > >from your most recent registration up to 01 May 2000 11:34:36 +0200, the > >time at which CFJ 1210 was called? I intend to Judge TRUE if the answer > >is no, FALSE if the answer is yes. > >Why would signing a message with my name select my name as a nickname? Because it might not be your legal name. However, I'll take this as equivalent to a simple no. I also argue that, while creation of a nickname is regulated by Rule 869 (Registered Players), destruction of a nickname is not regulated by any Rule, and is thus permitted by Rule 101. I Judge TRUE on CFJ 1210. ======================================================================== Judge Murphy's Evidence: ======================================================================== Clerk of the Courts harvel -- Michael Slone I heard how they liked everybody and I said so too. That is not a sentence and you see just why it is not why it should be. -- Gertrude Stein