From: To: agora-off Subject: OFF: CFJ 1186 Judged TRUE Date: Wednesday, December 08, 1999 6:13 PM ====================================================================== CFJ 1186 The Clerk of the Courts is required by Rule 1868 to select a Judge who is eligible at the time that the Judge is selected, regardless of whether that Player was eligible at the time that the CFJ was actually called for or when the identity of that Player is announced. ====================================================================== Motion 1186.1 by Wes: We also Move that Rule 1868 be Annotated with the above Statement. Granted by Blob with: I order the Rulekeepor to annotate Rule 1868 with the statement of this CFJ. ====================================================================== Called by: Wes Judge: Blob Judgement: TRUE Judge selection: Eligible: Blob, Elysion, harvel, Kolja, Lee, Michael, Murphy, Palnatoke, Peekee, Steve, t Not eligible: Caller: Wes Barred: - Had their turn: Chuck, Crito Already served: - Defaulted: - By request: - On Hold: elJefe ====================================================================== History: Called by Wes: 07 Dec 1999 23:58:52 -0800 Assigned to Blob: 08 Dec 1999 00:33:27 -0800 Judged TRUE by Blob: 09 Dec 1999 12:13:43 +1100 Judgement Distributed: As of this message ===================================================================== Caller's Arguments: Rule 1868 reads, in part: Whenever there is an open Call for Judgement to which no Player has been assigned as its Judge, the Clerk of the Court shall, as soon as possible after being made aware of this condition, select a Player to be assigned as its Judge. This selection shall be made from amongst all those Players eligible to serve as the Judge of that CFJ. Although not stated explicitly, this paragraph would imply that the selection of a Judge is based on those conditions which prevail at the time that the selection is made. Common sense also tells us the same thing, as it would be quite improbable to make any kind of reasonable selection based on what *might* happen in the future, even the near future. ====================================================================== Evidence attached by the Caller: ====================================================================== Judge's Arguments: The caller's argument is straightforward, and I see to reason to contradict it. ======================================================================