I order the Bank to pay Sherlock 1 VT for this Judgement. -- elJefe ===================================================================== CFJ 1084 "Chuck did not commit the Infraction of Failure to Report at the end of the Nomic Week of Feb. 9, 1998." ====================================================================== Judge: Sherlock Judgement: TRUE Eligible: Blob, Crito, elJefe, General Chaos, Harlequin, Jester, Kolja A., Morendil, Murphy, Oerjan, Sherlock, Steve, Swann, Time Agent Ineligible: Caller: Chuck Barred: Michael On request: On hold: ====================================================================== Injunction by Judge Sherlock: I order the Registrar to order the Bank to pay Chuck 2 Indulgences and 2 VT's, if Chuck paid these same amounts to satisfy RIPO1 and RVTPO11. ====================================================================== History: Called by Chuck, 16 Feb 1998 15:44:51 -0600 Assigned to Sherlock, 23 Feb 1998 12:54:00 +0000 Judged TRUE, with Injunction, 26 Feb 1998 20:28:19 -0500 ====================================================================== Caller's Arguments: I sent the Short Logical Ruleset, which constitutes the Official Report of the Rulekeepor, to agora-official prior to the end of the Nomic Week. However, it was not received by gecko until after the end of the Nomic Week Although it may be that a message sent to one of the PF listservs does not take effect until it is received by the listserv, that is irrelevant to the Infraction of Failure to Report, which requires only that an Offical Report be "post[ed]" each Nomic Week. I would submit that the proper interpretation of "post" is synonymous with "send", and I did send the SLR in the week in question. ====================================================================== Evidence provided by Caller: 1. headers from my post of the SLR, as received by Oerjan, excerpted 2. Rule 1686 3. Rule 1051 >>From owner-agora-officia-@gecko.serc.rmit.edu.au Mon Feb 16 01:35:02 1998 >Received: from gecko.serc.rmit.edu.au ([144.110.168.141] EHLO >gecko.serc.rmit.edu.au ident: majordomo [port 33872]) by >sabre-wulf.nvg.ntnu.no with ESMTP id <49667-23925>; Mon, 16 Feb 1998 >01:35:00 +0100 >Received: (from majordom-@localhost) > by gecko.serc.rmit.edu.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA21816 > for agora-official-list; Mon, 16 Feb 1998 11:16:47 +1100 >Received: from dfw.dfw.net (dfw.dfw.net [198.175.15.10]) > by gecko.serc.rmit.edu.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id LAA21753 > for agora-officia-@gecko.serc.rmit.edu.au; Mon, 16 Feb 1998 >11:12:25 + >1100 >Received: by dfw.dfw.net (4.1/SMI-4.1) > id AA15907; Sun, 15 Feb 98 17:22:42 CST >Date: Sun, 15 Feb 98 17:22:42 CST >Message-Id: 9802152322.aa1590-@dfw.dfw.net >From: Charles Carroll ccarrol-@dfw.net >To: Agora Official agora-officia-@gecko.serc.rmit.edu.au >Subject: OFF: Short Logical Ruleset Rule 1686/0 (Power=1) Official Reports For each Office, the Rules may designate a set of information to be the corresponding Officer's Report. All such Reports are Official Reports. The only information that is part of an Official Report is that which the Rules specifically state is part of that Official Report. The holder of an Office for which there is an Official Report shall maintain all information in the Report, and shall post it to the Public Forum at least once every Nomic Week. Failure to post the Official Report is the Infraction of Failure to Report, the penalty for which is the same as the penalty for a Class D Crime. The Registrar and the Speaker are authorised to detect and report commissions of this Infraction. History: Created by Proposal 2839 (Zefram), Mar. 11 1997 Rule 1051/11 (Power=1) The Office of the Rulekeepor There shall exist the Office of Rulekeepor. The Rulekeepor shall receive a weekly Salary equal to 2 times the Basic Officer Salary. The Rulekeepor shall maintain a complete list of all Rules. The Short Logical Ruleset constitutes the Rulekeepor's Official Report. In addition, the Rulekeepor shall post the Full Logical Ruleset to the Public Forum at least once each month. History: ... Amended(1) by Proposal 1735, Oct. 15 1995 Amended(2) by Proposal 2042, Dec. 11 1995 Amended(3) by Proposal 2048, Dec. 19 1995 Amended(4) by Proposal 2662, Sep. 12 1996 Amended(5) by Proposal 2696, Oct. 10 1996 Null-Amended(6) by Proposal 2710, Oct. 12 1996 Amended(7) by Proposal 2741 (Zefram), Nov. 7 1996, substantial Infected and Amended(8) by Rule 1454, Nov. 27 1996, substantial (unattributed) Amended(9) by Proposal 2783 (Chuck), Jan. 15 1997, substantial Amended(10) by Proposal 3452 (Steve), Apr. 7 1997, substantial Amended(11) by Proposal 3675 (Michael), Jan. 30 1998 ====================================================================== Judge's Arguments: I have chosen not to include a Judge's Argument, as it does not seem to be required and this issue seems pretty straightforward. ======================================================================